Typically 3 to 5 weeks from kickoff to readout, mostly gathering data. Not a guarantee.
AI Consulting
A ranked plan to cut costs and grow your margin.
A consulting-style review of your books and operations that ranks every saving, pricing gap and process fix by value, effort and payback. AI does the weeks of data work a firm would bill for; a person checks every finding.
- Every number traceable
- Opportunities ranked by payback
- A 90-day plan
- Fixed fee, agreed up front
The free assessment: 30 minutes, your top three opportunities and a rough estimate. The review: 3 to 5 weeks inside your books, with every opportunity sized from your own data.
Counted savings, year one
Half of anything that depends on a negotiation
Total: $186,000 counted of $348,000 identified
Five places we look for margin.
Margin usually leaks out in small places nobody has had time to check.
Costs and vendors
Every expense line, trended. Vendor price creep, overlapping subscriptions and contracts worth renegotiating.
Pricing and margin
Margin by job, product, service line and customer, and where prices have fallen behind costs.
Time and process
Where your team’s hours go, where work gets redone and where handoffs stall.
Cash
Receivables, payment terms, inventory and the cash they tie up.
Growth economics
What each marketing channel and customer type really costs, and what it returns.
Watch a P&L turn into a ranked plan.
A second fictional business: Larder & Flame Kitchen Co., two restaurants and a catering kitchen. Watch the agent read its P&L, rank the savings and lay out the roadmap.
See all six demos- QuickBooksP&L, trailing 12 months
- POSsales by hour and item, 12 months
- Payrollhours and overtime, 26 pay periods
- Vendor invoices214 invoices, 3,912 lines
- Contractsproduce and protein price agreements
- Delivery apps12 monthly statements
- Card processing12 monthly statements
- Utilities24 bills + interval meter data
- Matched 3,912 invoice lines to contract prices23 items billed above contract, avg +6.8%1
- Compared recipes with item sales and purchases5 top sellers over-portioned2
- Mapped 26 pay periods to covers by hourovertime 6.2% of hours; Mon–Wed 2–5 pm overstaffed3
- Read 12 delivery-app statements$648,000 in app sales at a 25% average commission4
- Read 12 card statements2.85% effective rate on $2.88M of card sales; two quotes on file at 2.70%5
- Read 24 utility bills with interval dataequipment on ~3 hrs before open; HVAC on overnight6
Days 1–30 · Quick wins
Day 30: $25,560/yr in place
Days 31–60 · Core fixes
Day 60: $61,200/yr in place
Days 61–90 · Grow direct
Day 90: all five live · $79,200/yr identified ($39,600 counted)
P&L · trailing 12 months
Opportunities
Counted = half of identified, because each saving depends on your decisions or a negotiation. Revenue held at $3.6M; opportunities modeled independently.
EBITDA margin · counted savings
Larder & Flame Kitchen Co. · $3.6M revenue
- Today
- Counted savings
- Modeled
90-day roadmap
Days 1–30 · Quick wins
Day 30: $25,560/yr in place
Days 31–60 · Core fixes
Day 60: $61,200/yr in place
Days 61–90 · Grow direct
Day 90: all five live · $79,200/yr identified ($39,600 counted)
This demo needs JavaScript. Here's the step-by-step version instead.Motion is reduced, so every step is shown at once. Press Play to step through them one at a time.
- Larder & Flame: 2 restaurants, catering, 40 staff. The books go in.
- Every line of the P&L, with the invoices and statements behind it.
- It traces each cost to its source: invoices, schedules, fees, meters.
- Five opportunities, ranked by dollars a year, with effort for each.
- EBITDA margin, counting half of each saving: 6.40% to 7.50%.
- A 90-day roadmap: quick wins first, an owner for every step.
- $79,200 a year identified, with a plan and owners to capture it.
Read the step-by-stepHide the step-by-step
- Larder & Flame: 2 restaurants, catering, 40 staff. The books go in.
- Connected · read-only: QuickBooks (P&L, trailing 12 months); POS (sales by hour and item, 12 months); Payroll (hours and overtime, 26 pay periods); Vendor invoices (214 invoices, 3,912 lines); Contracts (produce and protein price agreements); Delivery apps (12 monthly statements); Card processing (12 monthly statements); Utilities (24 bills + interval meter data).
- Every line of the P&L, with the invoices and statements behind it.
- P&L, trailing 12 months: Revenue $3,600,000 (100.0%); Food & beverage cost $1,116,000 (31.0%); Labor (wages, taxes, benefits) $1,152,000 (32.0%); Occupancy (rent, CAM) $288,000 (8.0%); Delivery-app commissions $162,000 (4.5%); Packaging & supplies $126,000 (3.5%); Utilities $108,000 (3.0%); G&A and other $101,520 (2.8%); Card processing $82,080 (2.3%); Repairs & maintenance $72,000 (2.0%); Marketing $54,000 (1.5%); Insurance $43,200 (1.2%); Waste, linen & services $36,000 (1.0%); Software & subscriptions $28,800 (0.8%).
- Total costs $3,369,600 (93.6%). EBITDA $230,400 (6.4%).
- It traces each cost to its source: invoices, schedules, fees, meters.
- Matched 3,912 invoice lines to contract prices: 23 items billed above contract, avg +6.8%.
- Compared recipes with item sales and purchases: 5 top sellers over-portioned.
- Mapped 26 pay periods to covers by hour: overtime 6.2% of hours; Mon–Wed 2–5 pm overstaffed.
- Read 12 delivery-app statements: $648,000 in app sales at a 25% average commission.
- Read 12 card statements: 2.85% effective rate on $2.88M of card sales; two quotes on file at 2.70%.
- Read 24 utility bills with interval data: equipment on ~3 hrs before open; HVAC on overnight.
- Five opportunities, ranked by dollars a year, with effort for each.
- 1. Food cost: enforce contract prices and portion specs. Identified $28,800 a year, counted $14,400 (+0.40 pts). Effort medium, 30–60 days. 23 items billed above contract (avg +6.8%): $16,200. 5 top sellers over-portioned: $12,600.
- 2. Labor: schedule to forecast, cut overtime. Identified $23,040 a year, counted $11,520 (+0.32 pts). Effort medium, 30–60 days. Overtime 6.2% → 4.8% of hours: $10,800. 680 overstaffed hours × $18 loaded: $12,240.
- 3. Delivery: move repeat app orders to direct ordering. Identified $18,000 a year, counted $9,000 (+0.25 pts). Effort medium, 60–90 days. Shift $100,000 of $648,000 app sales from a 25% commission to ~7% all-in.
- 4. Energy: equipment schedule and HVAC setbacks. Identified $5,040 a year, counted $2,520 (+0.07 pts). Effort low, 2 weeks. Fryers and ovens on ~3 hrs before open; HVAC on overnight. ~5% of $108,000.
- 5. Card processing: switch to interchange-plus. Identified $4,320 a year, counted $2,160 (+0.06 pts). Effort low, 2–4 weeks. 2.85% → 2.70% on $2.88M of card sales; two quotes on file.
- Total: $79,200 identified, $39,600 counted (+1.10 pts).
- Counted = half of identified, because each saving depends on your decisions or a negotiation. Revenue held at $3.6M; opportunities modeled independently.
- EBITDA margin, counting half of each saving: 6.40% to 7.50%.
- EBITDA margin · counted savings: EBITDA margin today 6.40% ($230,400) → Food cost +0.40 pts ($14,400) → Labor +0.32 pts ($11,520) → Delivery +0.25 pts ($9,000) → Energy +0.07 pts ($2,520) → Card processing +0.06 pts ($2,160) → Modeled EBITDA margin 7.50% ($270,000).
- Counted savings only: half of each identified amount, on $3.6M revenue. If all five land in full: 8.60%.
- A 90-day roadmap: quick wins first, an owner for every step.
- Switch card processing to interchange-plus: Nina C. + Carla D., days 1–21, $4,320/yr identified.
- Equipment start-up schedule and HVAC setbacks: Tyler R. + Simone W., days 1–14, $5,040/yr identified.
- Contract-price check on every invoice; claim credits: Andre M. + agent, days 1–30, then ongoing, $16,200/yr identified.
- Portion specs and plating photos for 5 top sellers: Andre M., days 31–45, $12,600/yr identified.
- Forecast-based schedules at both locations: Tyler R. + Simone W. + agent, days 31–60, $23,040/yr identified.
- Direct online ordering with a bag-insert offer: Nina C., days 61–90, $18,000/yr identified.
- Weekly margin dashboard; day-90 review: Agent + Nina C., days 61–90, tracks all five.
- Milestones: Day 30: $25,560/yr in place · Day 60: $61,200/yr in place · Day 90: all five live · $79,200/yr identified ($39,600 counted).
- $79,200 a year identified, with a plan and owners to capture it.
- Data to findings
- 2 days vs ~8 weeks
- Counted savings
- $39,600 a year
- EBITDA margin
- 7.50% from 6.40%
Simulated demo. Larder & Flame Kitchen Co. and the people named are fictional. Figures are modeled estimates.
The analysis a good consultant would do, done in days.
AI reads every transaction and builds the models. A person checks the findings and makes the recommendations.
Cost review
Categorizes and trends every expense. Flags price creep, duplicate tools and spending that has grown faster than revenue.
Margin by job, product and customer
Shows which work makes money and which quietly loses it, down to the line item.
Pricing analysis
Finds discounting patterns, underpriced services and costs that have outrun prices, with scenarios for adjusting.
Process mapping
Uses system data and short staff interviews to show where time goes and where work stalls.
Automation sizing
Estimates hours per task, cost per hour and what an agent could take on, ranked by value.
Cash and working capital
Receivables aging, payment terms and inventory turns, and what tightening them would free up.
Scenario modeling
Tests “what if” questions, like a price change, a new hire or a lost customer, with the assumptions visible.
Prioritized roadmap
Every opportunity ranked by expected savings, effort and payback, with an owner and a first step.
AI strategy and readiness
Where AI fits your business and where it doesn’t, the data and policies you need, and a plain AI use policy for staff.
Six deliverables. No 80-page binder.
Just what you need to decide and act, and the working model behind every number.
01
Executive summary
Two pages: what we found, what it’s worth and what to do first.
02
Opportunity register
A spreadsheet of every opportunity with estimated value, effort, payback and owner.
03
Margin waterfall
A chart that walks from today’s margin to your potential margin, one opportunity at a time.
04
90-day action plan
The first moves, in order, with owners and dates.
05
12-month roadmap
What to automate, fix or renegotiate next, and when.
06
The model
The working spreadsheet behind every number, yours to keep and update.
The model and the opportunity register are yours to keep, whether or not we keep working together.
From your data to a roadmap, in weeks.
Typically 3 to 5 weeks from kickoff to readout. Most of that goes to gathering data and fitting short interviews into your team’s week. The analysis itself takes days, not weeks of billed hours.
Kickoff
We agree on goals, constraints and the questions that matter most, then send a short data request.
Typically week 1
Data in
You share 12 to 24 months of financial and operational data, read-only or as exports. We handle the cleanup.
Typically weeks 1 to 2
Interviews
Short conversations with the people who run the work, usually 30 minutes each.
Typically week 2
Analysis and review
AI does the heavy lifting across every transaction. A person checks every finding before it reaches you.
Typically weeks 2 to 4
Readout and roadmap
We walk you through the findings and the plan, and answer every question.
Typically weeks 3 to 5
Optional: we implement. Hand the roadmap to your team, or have us build the agents that deliver it. Your call.
Timing depends mostly on how quickly data can be shared.
The same core deliverable. Not the same bill or the same wait.
From public records: what each kind of provider charges for this work, and how long you wait for recommendations.
| Provider | Typical cost for this scope | Time to recommendations | What's included | Access for a 20-100 person business |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent consultant or fractional executive | $15,600 to $31,500$130 to $175/hr × 120 to 180 hours. | 8 to 17 weeksModeled; part-time retainers run longer | Details: Independent consultant or fractional executive
One senior person doing interviews, analysis and recommendations. Depth depends on that person's hours and specialty. Access Most accessible. Retainers from $2,400/month for 12 to 15 hours (2026 proposal); fractional executives typically $7,000 to $11,200/month (2026). | Most accessible. Retainers from $2,400/month for 12 to 15 hours (2026 proposal); fractional executives typically $7,000 to $11,200/month (2026). |
| Regional boutique consulting firm | $31,500 to $75,000$175 to $250/hr × 180 to 300 hours. Public operations reviews ran $34,990 to $145,000 (2017-2025). | 4 to 7 monthsPublic-sector operations studies | Details: Regional boutique consulting firm
Interviews, process and staffing analysis, written report with prioritized recommendations. Access Takes small and mid-size clients, usually through a scoped proposal. Public examples are municipal reviews. | Takes small and mid-size clients, usually through a scoped proposal. Public examples are municipal reviews. |
| Big Four / large advisory firm | $45,000 to $105,000Blended $250 to $350/hr × 180 to 300 hours, the same team hours as a boutique review, if they take work this small. Their public-sector projects run about $290,000 to $1.5M+. | 8 to 17 weeksModeled | Details: Big Four / large advisory firm
Multi-level team (partner, manager, staff), diagnostic, benchmarks and a report with recommendations. Access Built for large organizations. Public examples are six- and seven-figure engagements; small-business work is uncommon. | Built for large organizations. Public examples are six- and seven-figure engagements; small-business work is uncommon. |
| Contingency expense-reduction firm | No upfront feeThen 30% to 50% of verified savings for 36 to 60 months: about 18 months of the savings, paid as fees (30% × 60 months or 50% × 36 months). Not comparable as a fixed price. | Varies by vendor categoryNo published rangeNot stated in the public agreements | Details: Contingency expense-reduction firm
Audits of specific vendor bills (utilities, telecom, waste, bank and merchant fees) and renegotiation. No whole-operations diagnostic or roadmap. Access No upfront cost, but covers narrow vendor categories only, and fees continue for years. | No upfront cost, but covers narrow vendor categories only, and fees continue for years. |
| Global strategy firm | Rarely works with 20-100 person businesses. Modeled at $285,600 to $1,009,800 and 8 to 15+ weeks for this scope, off this chart’s scale. See how it was modeled | |||
| Halyard AI ConsultingAI does the reading and the math. A person checks every finding. | Fixed fee, scoped after a free assessmentA fraction of the cost of a traditional engagement | Typically 3 to 5 weeksKickoff to readout. The analysis itself takes days. | Details: Halyard AI Consulting
You get an executive summary, opportunity register, margin waterfall, 90-day action plan, 12-month roadmap and the working model. Access Built for 20 to 500 person businesses. This table uses a 20-100 person scope; larger companies get a larger scope (more entities, more locations), priced the same way: a fixed fee after the free assessment. | Built for 20 to 500 person businesses. This table uses a 20-100 person scope; larger companies get a larger scope (more entities, more locations), priced the same way: a fixed fee after the free assessment. |
Typical market costs from public records, 2021-2026 (sources: cons-06 to cons-39, lab-22). Totals for this scope are modeled estimates: hourly rate × 120 to 300 hours, or weekly team fee × weeks. GSA schedule hourly ceiling rates (federal contracts) and New York State not-to-exceed rates are maximums for public-sector buyers, not what firms charge small businesses; at one large advisory firm, 2025 commercial rates ran about 2 to 3 times its GSA ceilings for the same titles (cons-09, cons-18). Firm names appear only in source citations. Nearly 1,000 Small Business Development Centers also offer no-cost consulting (cons-41).
How each range was modeled, with 23 sources
GSA schedule hourly ceiling rates (federal contracts) and New York State not-to-exceed rates are maximums for public-sector buyers, not what firms charge small businesses; at one large advisory firm, 2025 commercial rates ran about 2 to 3 times its GSA ceilings for the same titles (cons-09, cons-18). Firm names appear only in source citations. Nearly 1,000 Small Business Development Centers also offer no-cost consulting (cons-41).
- Independent consultant or fractional executive
- About $130 to $175/hr (modeled). GSA schedule hourly ceiling rates for small-business management consultants (federal contracts): 25th percentile $128.97, median $164.26 (2026). Fractional CFO/COO marketplace, middle 50%: $125 to $225/hr (2026).
- Regional boutique consulting firm
- About $175 to $250/hr (modeled). Public record: $34,990 for 179 hours, about $195/hr (small-office review, 2017).
- Big Four / large advisory firm
- $96 to $520/hr by title (GSA schedule hourly ceiling rates for federal contracts, and New York State not-to-exceed rates, 2025-2026). Modeled blended team rate: $250 to $350/hr.
- Contingency expense-reduction firm
- $0 upfront, then 30% to 50% of verified savings for 36 to 60 months (2026 public agreements).
- Global strategy firm
- About $400 to $1,600/hr by level (public-sector not-to-exceed rates, New York State contracts, 2025). Sold as weekly teams: $71,400 to $265,200 per week (2021 public price list, all-in).
Sources
- cons-11GSA CALC+ API, keyword 'management consultant', filter business_size S / O; full download filtered on labor_category, U.S. General Services Administration, 2026 (data as of 2026-10-12) (opens in a new tab)
- cons-34Workplace Strategy Consulting proposal, Waterbury Select Board meeting packet (May 2026), Town of Waterbury, Vermont, 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- lab-22Go Fractional, Fractional CFO Cost & Rates live benchmark, Go Fractional (fractional-talent marketplace), 2026 (page updated 2026-10-13 00:17 UTC, 'Last updated October 13, 2026') (opens in a new tab)
- cons-36Go Fractional, 'Fractional COO Cost & Rates', Go Fractional (fractional-talent marketplace), 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-31Minutes of the Ogden City Council regular meeting, Dec 16, 2025, Ogden City Council (Utah Public Notice Website), 2025 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-32Stephi Smith, 'Consultant recommends Jefferson City establish grants department', News Tribune, Aug 16, 2024, Jefferson City News Tribune, 2024 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-33'Village Considers Hiring Consultants to Conduct an Organizational Evaluation of the Assessor's Office', Scarsdale10583, Mar 1, 2017, Scarsdale10583 (local news), 2017 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-06GSA CALC+ API, keyword 'Ernst', U.S. General Services Administration, 2026 (data as of 2026-10-12) (opens in a new tab)
- cons-07GSA CALC+ API, keyword 'KPMG', U.S. General Services Administration, 2026 (data as of 2026-10-12) (opens in a new tab)
- cons-14NYS OGS Award 23269 Attachment 1 - Pricing, KPMG LLP (last updated 10/7/2025), New York State Office of General Services, 2025 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-15NYS OGS Award 23269 Attachment 1 - Pricing, Ernst & Young LLP (last updated 6/16/2025), New York State Office of General Services, 2025 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-16NYS OGS Award 23269 Attachment 1 - Pricing (Deloitte Consulting LLP; Accenture LLP), New York State Office of General Services, 2025-2026 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-28Houston Chronicle reporting as quoted by Off the Kuff (Charles Kuffner, Mar 31, 2025); scope from Community Impact (Kevin Vu, Feb 12, 2025), Houston Chronicle (via Off the Kuff); Community Impact, 2025 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-29Nick Castele, 'Cleveland to hire Ernst & Young to audit how City Hall works', Signal Cleveland, Apr 17, 2023, Signal Cleveland, 2023 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-30Rod McGuirk, 'Deloitte to partially refund Australian government for report with apparent AI-generated errors', Associated Press, Oct 7, 2025 (KSAT syndication), Associated Press, 2025 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-37Riverside County Board of Supervisors, Item 3.12, June 9, 2026, with Amendment No. 1, County of Riverside, California, 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-38K. Michelle Moran, 'Grosse Pointe Park hopes to find cost savings through utilities review', C&G Newspapers, Feb 25, 2026, C&G Newspapers, 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-39Cost and Revenue Review Agreement, NYCOM USA Program (rev. 09-30-2024), Village of Croton-on-Hudson, NY (meeting attachment, Nov 2024), 2024 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-12NYS OGS Award 23269 Attachment 1 - Pricing, McKinsey & Company, Inc (last updated 6/16/2025), New York State Office of General Services, 2025 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-13NYS OGS Award 23269 Attachment 1 - Pricing, The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. (last updated 6/16/2025), New York State Office of General Services, 2025 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-25McKinsey & Company, National Cooperative Purchasing Alliance 'Strategic Management Consulting' price quotation, Exhibit 4: McKinsey team bundle rates, McKinsey & Company (document hosted by Ohio procurement, procure.ohio.gov price lists), 2021 (Year 1 prices) (opens in a new tab)
- cons-26Austin Jenkins, '$165K a week for COVID analysis: That's how much WA paid a global consulting firm', Northwest News Network, Aug 10, 2020, Northwest News Network (public radio), 2020 (opens in a new tab)
- cons-27Arkansas Department of Transformation and Shared Services news release, Feb 9, 2024, State of Arkansas, 2024 (opens in a new tab)
Where a consulting fee goes.
In a traditional engagement you pay for consultant hours, and this scope takes a firm 120 to 300 of them. Even the most affordable option, an independent consultant or fractional executive, comes to $15,600 or more, and recommendations commonly take 8 weeks or longer.
In ours, AI does the reading, categorizing and modeling across every transaction. People spend their hours checking the findings and making the recommendations. That’s how the fee stays fixed and the work typically takes 3 to 5 weeks.
The free assessment comes first. You see the scope and the fixed fee in writing before any work starts. Have a quote from a consulting firm? Bring it, and we’ll compare it for the same scope.
Analysis you can check.
A roadmap is only useful if you trust the numbers behind it.
Traceable numbers
Every figure links back to the source data it came from.
Conservative assumptions
When an estimate could go either way, we use the lower number and say so.
Ranges, not false precision
Where the data is uncertain, savings are shown as a range.
A person checks every finding
AI does the reading and the math. A person reviews every recommendation before it reaches you.
Thin data, flagged
Where data is missing or messy, we tell you how that limits the conclusion.
Confidential by default
Your financials are used only for your analysis, accessed read-only and deleted on request when the work ends.
See how small fixes add up.
Back to Corran Valley Metalworks from the top of the page. Value comes from several modest fixes, and we count only half of any saving that depends on a negotiation.
Corran Valley Metalworks
Fictional custom metal fabricator · 160 employees
AI Consulting analyzes the ledger, vendor spend, overtime, quotes against actual job costs and software seats, then ranks each opportunity and delivers a 90-day roadmap.
Modeled value: $187,944 a year in the base case, up to $547,536 in the upside case.
3 to 7 hours back a month
- Team time
- Added gross profit
- Cost savings
Where the value comes from: Controller time, $1,944 to $4,536; Pricing on stale-cost quotes, $60,000 to $180,000; Materials, freight and software, $81,000 to $228,000; Overtime, $45,000 to $135,000.
$15,662 × 12 = $187,944Upside $45,628 × 12 = $547,536
Added revenue$60,000 to $180,000 a year
From repricing quotes on current material costs. The jobs cost the same, so all of it is gross profit.
Today
- Revenue and EBITDA
- $30,000,000; $2,400,000 (8.0%)
- Materials; freight; software
- $12,000,000; $1,200,000; $240,000
- Overtime pay
- $900,000 a year
- Quoted from stale material costs
- $6,000,000 of revenue a year
- Controller on margin reports
- 30 hours a month
With the plan
- Savings identified
- $348,000 a year (upside $708,000)
- Counted in year one
- $186,000 (upside $543,000)
- EBITDA with counted savings
- $2,586,000, 8.62% (upside 9.81%)
- Controller hours back
- 3 a month (upside 7)
| Source | Base | Upside |
|---|---|---|
| Controller time (Team time) | $1,944 | $4,536 |
| Pricing on stale-cost quotes (Added gross profit) | $60,000 | $180,000 |
| Materials, freight and software (Cost savings) | $81,000 | $228,000 |
| Overtime (Cost savings) | $45,000 | $135,000 |
| Modeled value a year | $187,944 | $547,536 |
The math
| Line item | Formula | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing: reprice quotes on current material costs | $6,000,000 × 2% = $120,000; count half | $60,000 |
| Overtime: better scheduling and realistic lead times | $900,000 × 10% = $90,000; count half | $45,000 |
| Materials: renegotiate and consolidate suppliers | $12,000,000 × 0.75% = $90,000; count half | $45,000 |
| Freight: consolidate and rebid carriers | $1,200,000 × 2% = $24,000; count half | $12,000 |
| Software: cancel unused seats | $240,000 × 10% = $24,000; in the client's control | $24,000 |
| Identified | $120,000 + $90,000 + $90,000 + $24,000 + $24,000 | $348,000 |
| Counted in year one | $60,000 + $45,000 + $45,000 + $12,000 + $24,000 | $186,000 |
| Counted savings per month | $186,000 ÷ 12 | $15,500 |
| Controller: recurring margin report | 30 × 10% = 3 hours × $54 (accountant) | $162 |
| Monthly value | $15,500 + $162 | $15,662 |
| Annual value | $15,662 × 12 | $187,944 |
| EBITDA margin with counted savings | ($2,400,000 + $186,000) ÷ $30,000,000 | 8.62% |
| Line item | Formula | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing at 4%, 75% counted | $6,000,000 × 4% = $240,000 × 75% | $180,000 |
| Overtime at 20%, 75% counted | $900,000 × 20% = $180,000 × 75% | $135,000 |
| Materials at 1.5%, 75% counted | $12,000,000 × 1.5% = $180,000 × 75% | $135,000 |
| Freight at 5%, 75% counted | $1,200,000 × 5% = $60,000 × 75% | $45,000 |
| Software at 20%, counted in full | $240,000 × 20% | $48,000 |
| Identified | $240,000 + $180,000 + $180,000 + $60,000 + $48,000 | $708,000 |
| Counted in year one | $180,000 + $135,000 + $135,000 + $45,000 + $48,000 | $543,000 |
| Controller (reports 25% faster) | 30 × 25% = 7 hours (rounded down) × $54 | $378 |
| Monthly value | $543,000 ÷ 12 + $378 | $45,628 |
| Annual value | $45,628 × 12 | $547,536 |
| EBITDA margin | ($2,400,000 + $543,000) ÷ $30,000,000 | 9.81% |
The upside case moves the rates that describe what the agent achieves to the optimistic end of the published evidence, all at once. The business’s own figures stay the same. Most results land in between.
What moves the number
- Your revenue and current margin
- How long since prices and vendor contracts were last reviewed
- How much of your team’s time goes to manual, repeatable work
- How quickly you act on the plan
Questions about AI Consulting.
Why does it cost so much less than a consulting firm?
Because much of a traditional fee pays for people reading your data by hand. AI does that part in days. You still get an experienced person checking every finding and building the plan, and you pay a fixed fee for the review, not an hourly bill.
How is this different from the free assessment?
The free assessment is a 30-minute call built on what you tell us, including the short intake form: your top three opportunities and a rough, modeled estimate. AI Consulting spends 3 to 5 weeks inside your books and operating data: every opportunity sized from your own transactions and ranked by payback, a 90-day plan, a 12-month roadmap and the working model. The assessment tells you whether a review is worth doing, and what the fixed fee would be, before you commit to anything.
How is this different from what my accountant does?
Your accountant keeps the books accurate, compliant and filed. We use those books, plus your operational data, to look forward: where you’re losing margin, what to fix first and what it’s worth. We’re happy to work alongside your accountant.
What data do you need?
Typically 12 to 24 months of profit and loss and balance sheet, a general ledger or transaction export, payroll summaries, vendor and customer lists, and any job, order or time data you have. Read-only access or exports both work. We send a checklist.
How long does it take?
Typically 3 to 5 weeks from kickoff to readout. Most of that is gathering data and scheduling short interviews; the analysis itself takes days. The biggest factor is how quickly data can be shared.
Do we have to use you to implement the roadmap?
No. The roadmap and the model are yours. Some recommendations need agents we can build. Others are a phone call to a vendor. You choose who does what.
Is AI really doing the analysis?
AI does the heavy lifting: reading every transaction, categorizing spend, spotting patterns and running the models. A person checks every finding, adds business judgment and makes the recommendations. You get the speed of one and the judgment of the other.
Free AI assessment
Find out where your margin is going.
On a free 30-minute call we’ll talk through your business and tell you where a review would likely find the most.
No cost, no obligation.
What you leave with
A written plan for your business
- Your top three opportunities, ranked
By estimated value and effort, specific to how your business runs.
- A rough savings estimate
A modeled estimate, with every assumption shown.
- A suggested first step
The first job to hand an agent, and what it would take.
Yours to keep, whether or not we work together.